Why I Chose the Leica SL2 Over the Leica SL3 as a Working Photographer
Intro: The Real-World Decision
If you’re considering upgrading to the Leica SL3, you’re probably wondering whether it’s really worth the price jump from the Leica SL2. As a professional photographer working across commercial, editorial, and documentary projects, I had to make the same decision. Spoiler alert—I went with the Leica SL2, and in this post, I’ll break down exactly why.
This isn’t about tech specs—it’s about real-world usability, pricing, and how each camera fits into a working pro’s workflow.
Why I Use Leica Cameras in the First Place
Before we get into the SL2 vs. SL3 debate, let’s address the obvious: why even use Leica when brands like Sony and Canon dominate the commercial photography world?
For me, it comes down to three things:
Design & Build Quality – Leica cameras have a robust, minimalist feel that I love. The SL2 fits perfectly in my hand, and I actually prefer its classic Leica design over the SL3’s more modernized look.
Optical Quality – Access to M lenses, R lenses, and SL lenses is a huge benefit for me. Leica glass is second to none, and I love using manual focus lenses for my documentary work.
Simplicity – I don’t need a camera packed with endless features. I need something that just works, and Leica’s menu system is refreshingly simple compared to Sony or Canon’s complex UI.
Leica SL2 vs. SL3 – Why I Chose the SL2
So, why did I go with the SL2 instead of the new Leica SL3?
Price: The SL2 is a Leica “Bargain”
Let’s be real—Leica cameras are expensive. But right now, the SL2 is around $3,000, while the SL3 costs $7,000. That’s a massive price gap for a relatively minor upgrade.
For $3,000 less, I still get:
✅ A 47MP full-frame sensor
✅ The same rugged, premium build quality
✅ Fantastic Leica glass compatibility
Autofocus? Not a Big Deal for My Work
The SL3 introduces phase-detect autofocus, which is a big leap forward for Leica. But here’s the thing: I don’t need it.
Most of my Leica work is manual focus anyway. When I do need autofocus, I grab my Sony A7S III or FX3. The SL3’s AF improvements weren’t enough to justify an extra $4,000.
3️⃣ Low-Light Handling & Lens Setup
For low-light commercial work, I use my SL2S because it handles higher ISO much better. The SL2 pairs perfectly with it, allowing me to dedicate one camera to manual lenses and one to autofocus lenses.
My current lens setup:
📷 Leica 24-90mm f/2.8-4 – My fast, go-to zoom
📷 Leica 35mm Summilux & 50mm Summilux – My favorite primes
📷 Voigtlander 75mm & 100mm Macro – For specialty work
Final Thoughts: Is the Leica SL3 Worth It?
If I were starting fresh and money wasn’t a factor, maybe I’d consider the SL3. But for a working professional balancing budgets, clients, and real-world needs, the SL2 is the smarter buy in 2025.
✅ It’s still a high-end Leica with stunning image quality
✅ It’s nearly half the price of the SL3
✅ It integrates seamlessly into my hybrid Sony & Leica workflow
Would I upgrade to the SL3 in the future? Maybe. But right now, I’d rather put that $4,000 toward lenses, lighting, or even an extra body.
What do you think? Would you go for the Leica SL2 or SL3? Drop a comment and let’s discuss!
My Full Gear Breakdown
Watch my full video breakdown here.
